In September 2025, the European Parliament approved a package of changes known as CBAM Omnibus I, aimed at simplifying and strengthening the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). These changes significantly reduce the administrative burden for small and occasional importers, without lowering the EU's climate ambitionsThe key modification is the introduction of a new exemption threshold – 50 tons per year – which will exclude approximately 90% of importers (mainly SMEs and individuals) from the system, while leaving CBAM within its reach 99% of CO₂ emissions are import-related goods covered by the mechanism. The Omnibus Package thus responds to business calls for simplification of procedures, while maintaining the fundamental objective of the CBAM, which is to protect the EU's energy-intensive sectors from carbon leakage in full compliance with the 2050 climate neutrality objective.

The amendment was adopted by a large majority (617 votes in favor) and, following formal approval by the Council, will enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the EU. Below, we present in detail all the adopted changes – as finalized in European Parliament document A10-0085/2025 and its annexes – and their practical implications for importers preparing for the new CBAM obligations.

Repealed provisions and new solutions in the CBAM regulation

The Omnibus Package amends over 20 articles of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 establishing the CBAM. Below, we detail the most important repeals and newly added regulations :

These changes mean that the existing CBAM regulations have been significantly updated. Below, we detail what these changes mean for importers in practice, broken down into key areas.

Requirements and obligations of importers after changes (50 tonnes threshold, authorization, delegation)

New 50-tonne threshold – Under the amendment, if the total mass of goods covered by CBAM (steel, iron, aluminum, cement, fertilizers) imported by a given entity does not exceed 50 tonnes in a calendar year , such importer is considered an "occasional CBAM importer" and benefits from an exemption from the main obligations. This exemption does not cover imports of electricity or hydrogen , as the bulk threshold was not deemed appropriate for these sectors (different nature of units and emissions). In practice, the 50-tonne threshold will apply to all imports in the four sectors mentioned above – not separately per sector – to prevent circumvention by fragmenting imports among different categories of goods. According to Commission analyses, the 50-tonne limit exempts ~90% of importers from CBAM obligations, leaving a maximum of ~1% of import emissions outside the system (the rest of the emissions are still subject to CBAM).

Exemption from obligations for small importers: An importer who anticipates not exceeding 50 tons per year does not need to apply for authorized CBAM declarant status or submit standard emissions declarations. The lack of authorization represents a significant relief – it means no need to register in the CBAM register, conduct detailed quarterly reporting, etc. However, this exemption from procedures goes hand in hand with the importer's responsibility to monitor their own import volume . Such an entity must monitor the weight of imported CBAM goods themselves to ensure they do not exceed the 50 tons threshold annually. If they are approaching the limit, they should take steps early enough to achieve full compliance (e.g., obtain authorization).

Exceeding the threshold: If an occasional importer exceeds a total of 50 tonnes during the year , they lose their exemption. Exceeding the threshold triggers the obligation to register as an authorized CBAM declarant and fulfill all standard obligations for the given year. Importantly, customs authorities and the Commission will jointly monitor import data to identify entities that exceed the threshold and fail to register. The new regulations require the Commission to verify annually (by April 30) whether the threshold still ensures 99% coverage of emissions – and authorize it to adjust the threshold via delegated act if changes in trade patterns warrant it. However, any adjustments to the threshold will be rare – the final text only provides for a change if the calculated threshold differs from the current one by more than 15 tonnes.

Obligations of importers above the threshold: Importers exceeding 50 tonnes per year (i.e., the top 10% of importers, accounting for ~99% of imported emissions) remain fully covered by the CBAM. Their main obligations are:

In summary, it's crucial for importers to determine their status: whether their imports exceed 50 tons per year or not . Small, occasional importers may be able to simply monitor their import volume and submit an annual summary report, while larger importers must prepare for the full process of authorization, emissions reporting, and certificate purchase.

Emissions calculation methods – simplifications, simple vs. complex goods, default values

One of the most practical improvements to the Omnibus package is the introduction of greater flexibility in the methods for calculating emissions attributed to imported goods. The original regulation required importers to obtain detailed data on the actual emissions during the production of each product. This proved particularly burdensome for SMEs that source goods from multiple suppliers. The new regulations give importers a choice and introduce a distinction between "simple" and "complex" goods.

Choosing between actual and default emissions

Optional use of default values: Importers can freely decide whether to use actual emissions (calculated based on data from the producer's installation) for a given commodity in their settlements or to use a pre-defined default value (a simplified emission factor). This applies to commodities other than electricity – special rules based on the actual emissions of the energy mix still apply to electricity. Default values ​​are to be determined by the Commission based on "best available data" and reflect the emission intensity of production in the exporting countries. According to the announcement, the default emission factors will be conservative – for example, based on the average of the 10 most emitting producers of a given commodity for which reliable data is available. This is to ensure that choosing the simplified option does not underestimate reported emissions (rather, it overestimates them), encouraging importers with lower emissions to report actual data.

Emissions verification: If an importer chooses to use actual emissions , the requirement remains that these data be verified by an accredited environmental verifier . The newly added Article 10a requires all verifiers to register with the CBAM system in the country where they are accredited. However, when default values ​​are used , there is no need for additional verification – they are treated as pre-approved indicators. This also simplifies the obligations of importers, especially those unable to obtain reliable data from foreign suppliers.

Choosing the "carbon price paid" settlement method: Similar flexibility has been introduced for the deduction of emissions costs incurred abroad . As a reminder, the CBAM mechanism allows the amount of certificates due to be reduced by any carbon price paid in the country of origin (e.g., carbon tax, ETS allowance cost, etc.) to avoid double charging. Following the changes, importers can choose whether to document the actual price paid for emissions in the producer's country or use the default carbon price set by the Commission for a given country. Note: A consistency rule has been introduced – if an importer uses the default emissions value , they must also use the default carbon price value for the country. Therefore, selective mixing of approaches (e.g., low default emissions with a high actual carbon fee) is prohibited. This is to prevent potential abuse and ensure that simplifications do not lead to underpayments. The Commission has announced the publication of default carbon price tables for individual third countries from 2027.

These options allow importers to tailor their emissions reporting to their operational capabilities. For small foreign suppliers unable to provide detailed environmental data, using the default values ​​will be a simpler alternative (avoiding the need for complex calculations and audits), although it will generally be less financially advantageous, as these values ​​will be fixed at a premium. Companies importing from modern, low-emission installations will still be able to report lower actual emissions , reducing their CBAM costs, provided they submit verified reports.

Simple vs. Complex Goods – A New Approach to Emissions in the Value Chain

The amendment introduces a distinction between simple goods , whose emissions result from a single underlying production process, and complex goods , whose production involves multiple steps and components (including precursors , i.e., intermediate products covered by CBAM or the EU ETS used to produce the final product). This is important when calculating the "embedded emissions" attributed to an imported good, so as to avoid double-counting of emissions that have already been accounted for or trace emissions.

Assumptions of the new rules for complex goods:

The new approach rewards transparency and shortens the emissions chain to the most important links . In practice, the importer will focus on obtaining data on emissions related to the production of key components of their product. For example, if a metal product made of steel and aluminum is imported, the importer will calculate the emissions resulting from the production of steel and aluminum (or use their default or actual values), while emissions from the process of combining these materials into the finished product (unless this process is high-emission and covered by the ETS) will not be included.

This distinction between goods is also crucial for the future expansion of the CBAM . The Commission will assess the possibility of extending the CBAM to additional sectors as early as 2026. The introduced definitions of complex goods and the mechanisms for exempting precursor emissions are intended to pave the way for the possible inclusion of more complex products in the CBAM in the future, without excessive calculation complexity.

Submitting declarations and managing certificates – new deadlines and settlement rules

The amendment significantly changes the schedule and procedures for submitting annual CBAM declarations and handling certificates . The goal is to give companies more time to fulfill their obligations and to reduce one-time financial burdens by spreading them over time. Below, we explain what the CBAM settlement cycle will look like after 2026.

Extended deadline for the annual CBAM declaration

Annual Declaration by October 31st: Previous regulations required authorized importers to submit a declaration for the previous year (including import volume and calculated emissions) to the CBAM authorities by May 31st of each year and simultaneously surrender the corresponding certificates. The Omnibus package extends this deadline by five months, to October 31st of the following year. This means importers will have almost 10 months (instead of five) to collect data, verify emissions, and prepare their annual declaration.

Example: For 2026, the CBAM declaration, along with the emissions settlement, will need to be submitted by October 31, 2027 (instead of May, as originally scheduled). Similarly, for 2027, the deadline will be October 31, 2028, and so on. This is a nod to companies that reported difficulties in preparing complete data so quickly after the end of the year.

Synchronization with the ETS: The new October deadline better aligns with the EU ETS calendar. National ETS registries often finalize emissions and allocation data by the end of March, while previously CBAM importers had only about two months to comply and purchase certificates. This window is now longer, reducing the risk of rushed submissions or errors in declarations.

First settlement year – 2026 settled in 2027

Extended Transition Period: Although the CBAM transition period formally ends on December 31, 2025 , the Omnibus package effectively extends the absence of financial obligations by an additional year . Importers will not be required to purchase certificates quarterly or in 2026 for 2026 – certificate sales will not begin until February 1, 2027. In other words, emissions imported in 2026 will be settled as a single payment in 2027. This is due to "many uncertainties related to 2026" – the Commission concluded that additional time is needed for the certificate system to function smoothly from a technical and market perspective. For importers, this means that the entire year 2026 will be free from certificate expenditures (although emissions data must be collected, and a declaration must be submitted by the end of October 2027, at which time the payment must be made).

No Quarterly Payments in 2026: The original regulations stipulated that, starting January 1, 2026, importers would be required to gradually purchase certificates throughout the year – at the end of each quarter, they would have at least 80% of their total emissions from the beginning of the year. The amendment removes this obligation for 2026 – the first partial payments will begin in the first quarter of 2027 (details below). This means that companies will not have to "lock up" their capital in certificates before the end of the year in 2026.

Rules for acquiring and redeeming CBAM certificates from 2027

Certificate sales start – February 2027: National authorities will not start selling CBAM units until February 1, 2027. From that date, importers will be able to purchase certificates needed to settle emissions for 2026 and gradually for 2027. In practice, this gives 8 additional months (February-September 2027) to collect certificates required for redemption for 2026, which significantly alleviates the one-off financial burden.

Quarterly 50% Certificate Obligation: Starting in 2027, a relaxed mechanism for protecting against year-end purchases will be introduced. At the end of each quarter, authorized importers will be required to hold at least 50% of the number of certificates corresponding to their imported emissions from the beginning of the year to the end of the given quarter. This reduces the requirement from the current 80% to 50% . The goal: to reduce financial pressure – importers will purchase only half of their expected certificates during the year; they can purchase the rest later. For example, after the first quarter of 2027, they must have certificates for at least 50% of their Q1 emissions, and after the second quarter, they must have certificates for at least 50% of their six-month emissions (if they imported more in Q2, they will purchase additional certificates to cover half of the Q1+Q2 total), and so on. The remaining balance will be settled in their annual declaration.

Annual Certificate Redemption: After the end of the year, the importer submits the final settlement. Under the new calendar, the annual declaration and the corresponding number of certificates must be submitted by September 30/October 31 of the following year . In practice, this may occur simultaneously with the declaration submission (e.g., by September 30 – according to the Commission proposal – or by October 31 – according to the final version adopted by the European Parliament). To be on the safe side, it's worth setting a September 30 deadline for redeeming certificates for the previous year to meet the cut-off date for unit cancellations (see below).

Cancellation of unused certificates: If an importer purchased more certificates than their final requirement (which can happen, for example, if they prudently purchased certificates during the year), they will be able to recover the excess by reselling the certificates to the authority. The new regulations provide a positive change in this regard: the one-third limit has been abolished – previously, the government could only buy back up to one-third of the certificates purchased the previous year. Now, all excess certificates can be submitted for buyback , provided they were purchased to meet the quarterly 50% emission requirement. The importer submits a buyback application by October 31st (if the redemption date is September 30th) of the current year, and unused certificates will then be canceled on November 1st without compensation. In other words, after November 1st, any certificates purchased in the previous year will no longer be valid – they must be used (cancelled) or returned for purchase within the prescribed deadline; otherwise, they are forfeited.

Certificate Price: Under the CBAM mechanism, the price of CBAM units will be linked to the price of EU ETS allowances – it is intended to correspond to the average auction price of EUAs in the week preceding the purchase. Certificates will be available for purchase from national authorities (e.g., via a common central platform operated by the Commission). The fee system and any administrative charges will be defined in implementing acts – the final text stipulates that the Commission may impose a fee for using the certificate sales platform to cover its operating costs. However, there is a caveat that these fees must be limited to covering costs (without generating profit or being unduly burdensome).

Thanks to the above changes, the certificate management process will become more friendly to the financial liquidity of companies : a smaller portion of certificates purchased "in advance" during the year (50% instead of 80%), full possibility of reselling surpluses, more time to collect funds before final redemption.

Other new rules: country-of-origin carbon fees, indirect representatives, sanctions, registries and transparency

In addition to the key areas discussed above, the Omnibus package introduces a number of additional changes to complement the CBAM system. These include the method for accounting for emissions costs incurred abroad ( carbon price paid ), clarifying the role of indirect representatives, tightening or easing sanctions for non-compliance, and streamlining the registry and information flow. These include:

Schedule for implementing changes and division of responsibilities over the years

The final key issue is the implementation calendar for the new CBAM solutions. Importers must understand which obligations apply to them and when. Below is a chronological timeline from the transition phase to full implementation, taking into account the changes to the Omnibus package:

For now, importers should focus on transitioning from the reporting phase to the financial settlement phase in 2026/2027 . It is crucial to ensure that the company has the appropriate status (authorization) or qualifies for an exemption by the end of 2025, and to plan a budget for purchasing certificates from 2027. These schedule changes provide some respite – the first expenses will come later – but they do not relieve the company of substantive preparations (collecting emissions data, adapting accounting/IT systems to support CBAM, etc.).

Summary

The CBAM Omnibus package brings significant simplification and clarification for importers, while maintaining the ambitious environmental goals of the mechanism. The smallest importers will be virtually excluded from the system (leaving them to simply monitor import volumes), while larger importers will benefit from extended deadlines and more flexible emission reporting methods. Authorization and reporting procedures will be simplified (e.g., the ability to delegate tasks and reduce unnecessary administrative consultations), and financial risks will be minimized thanks to the possibility of spreading certificate purchases into installments and a surplus buyback mechanism.

For importers, it's crucial to thoroughly familiarize yourself with the new obligations and deadlines —especially the 50-ton threshold, the new declaration calendar (October 31st), and the requirements for emissions data. It's worth assessing now whether your company will benefit from the exemption (which does not exempt it from monitoring import volumes) or whether it needs to prepare for the full CBAM regime. Regardless of the import volume, it's recommended to implement internal procedures for recording the carbon intensity of imported products and tracking the total import volume.

The Omnibus Package demonstrated that the European legislator is open to adapting regulations to business realities without compromising the fundamental goal of climate policy. Importers should therefore actively utilize new simplifications (e.g., the use of default values ​​where data is difficult to obtain) while ensuring that all obligations—from authorization to timely surrender of certificates—are fulfilled in accordance with the new guidelines . Organizational and systemic preparations already in 2025 will allow for a smooth transition to the new CBAM regime from 2026 and avoid a rush in 2027, when the first actual emissions settlement will take place. These changes make the CBAM mechanism more predictable and business-friendly, which should make it easier for importers to meet their obligations while supporting the achievement of the common goal of a level playing field in trade and reducing global CO₂ emissions.

Sources: The changes described above are taken from official EU documents and expert analyses, including the European Parliament press release and the adopted text of the EP amendments (A10-0085/2025)

One answer

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *