In September 2025, the European Parliament approved a package of changes known as CBAM Omnibus I, aimed at simplifying and strengthening the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). These changes significantly reduce the administrative burden for small and occasional importers, without lowering the EU's climate ambitionsThe key modification is the introduction of a new exemption threshold – 50 tons per year – which will exclude approximately 90% of importers (mainly SMEs and individuals) from the system, while leaving CBAM within its reach 99% of CO₂ emissions are import-related goods covered by the mechanism. The Omnibus Package thus responds to business calls for simplification of procedures, while maintaining the fundamental objective of the CBAM, which is to protect the EU's energy-intensive sectors from carbon leakage in full compliance with the 2050 climate neutrality objective.

The amendment was adopted by a large majority (617 votes in favour) and will enter into force after formal approval by the Council. on the third day after publication in the Official Journal of the EU. Below we present in detail all the adopted changes – in accordance with the final text of the European Parliament document A10-0085 / 2025 together with annexes – and their practical consequences for importers preparing for the new CBAM obligations.

Repealed provisions and new solutions in the CBAM regulation

The Omnibus Package amends over 20 articles of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 establishing the CBAM. Below we detail the most important ones. repeal of existing provisions and newly added regulations:

These changes mean that the existing CBAM regulations have been significantly updated. Below, we detail what these changes mean for importers in practice, broken down into key areas.

Requirements and obligations of importers after changes (50 tonnes threshold, authorization, delegation)

New 50 tonne threshold – According to the amendment, if total weight of goods covered by CBAM (steel, iron, aluminum, cement, fertilizers) imported by a given entity does not exceed 50 tonnes per calendar year, such importer is deemed to be "occasional CBAM importer" and benefits from exemption from major obligations. This exemption does not include imports of electricity or hydrogen, because for these sectors the bulk threshold was not considered appropriate (different nature of units and emissions). In practice, the 50 tonne threshold will be applied collectively to all imports in the four sectors mentioned – not separately for each sector – which prevents circumvention of the regulations by fragmenting imports across different categories of goods. According to Commission analyses, the 50-ton limit exempts ~90% of importers from CBAM obligations, leaving a maximum of ~1% of import emissions outside the system (the rest of the emissions are still subject to CBAM).

Exemption from obligations for small importers: Importer who is expected to not exceed 50 tons per year, does not need to apply for the status of an authorized CBAM declarant or submit standard emission declarations. No authorization required constitutes a significant relief – it means there is no need to register in the CBAM register, conduct detailed quarterly reporting, etc. However, freedom from procedures goes hand in hand with the importer's responsibility for monitoring your own import volumeSuch an entity must itself control the weight of the imported CBAM goods in order to not to exceed the threshold of 50 tonnes per year. If he is approaching the limit, he should take steps to achieve full compliance in good time (e.g. obtain authorization).

Crossing the threshold: In the event that an occasional importer will exceed a total of 50 tons during the year, he loses his exemption. Exceeding the threshold gives rise to the obligation to register as an authorized CBAM declarant and fulfilling all standard obligations for the given year. Importantly, Customs authorities and the Commission will jointly monitor Import data to detect entities that exceed the threshold and fail to register. The new regulations require the Commission to verify annually (by April 30) whether the threshold still ensures coverage of 99% of emissions – and authorize it to adjust the threshold via a delegated act if changes in trade patterns justify it. However, any potential adjustment to the threshold will be rare – the final text only provides for a change if the calculated threshold differs from the applicable one. more than 15 tons.

Obligations of importers above the threshold: Importers who exceed 50 tons per year (i.e., approximately 10% of the largest importers, accounting for ~99% of import emissions), remain fully covered by the CBAM mechanism. Their main responsibilities are:

In summary, it is crucial for importers to determine their status: whether their imports will exceed 50 tons per year or notSmall, occasional importers may simply need to monitor their import volume and submit an annual summary report, while larger importers must prepare for the full process of authorization, emissions reporting, and certificate purchase.

Emissions calculation methods – simplifications, simple vs. complex goods, default values

One of the most practical improvements to the Omnibus package is the introduction of greater flexibility in emission calculation methods attributed to imported goods. The original regulation required importers to obtain detailed data on the actual emissions during the production of each product. This proved particularly burdensome for SMEs that source goods from multiple suppliers. The new regulations give importers a choice and distinguish between "simple" and "complex" goods.

Choosing between actual and default emissions

Optional use of default values: The importer can free to decidewhether it will be used in settlements for a given product actual emission volume (calculated based on data from the manufacturer's installation) or will it use established default value (simplified emission factor). This applies to goods other than electricity - for electricity, special rules based on the actual emissions of the energy mix still apply. Default values are to be determined by the Commission based on "best available data" and reflect the emission intensity of production in exporting countries. According to the announcement, the default emission factors will be conservative – for example, based on the average of the 10 most emitting producers of a given commodity for which reliable data is available. This is to ensure that the choice of the simplified option will not underestimate reported emissions (it will rather overestimate them), encouraging importers with lower emissions to report actual data.

Emissions verification: If the importer decides to actual emissions, the requirement remains that these data are verified by an accredited environmental verifierThe newly added Article 10a imposes an obligation on all verifiers registration in the CBAM system in the country where they were accredited. However, when default values ​​are used, there is no need for additional verification – they are treated as pre-approved indicators. This also simplifies the duties of importers, especially those unable to obtain reliable data from foreign suppliers.

Choosing the “carbon price paid” settlement method: Similar flexibility was introduced in the countdown emission costs incurred abroadLet us remind you that the CBAM mechanism allows you to reduce the number of certificates due by any carbon price paid in the country of origin (e.g. carbon tax, ETS allowance cost, etc.) to avoid double charging. Following the changes, the importer can choose whether to document the price actually paid for the emissions in the country of production, whether it will benefit from default carbon price established by the Commission for a given country. Warning: The principle of consistency has been introduced – if the importer uses the default emission value, To must also use the default carbon price value for a country. Therefore, it is impossible to selectively mix approaches (e.g., low default emissions with a high actual carbon fee). This is to prevent potential abuses and ensure that simplifications do not lead to underpayments. The Commission has announced the publication of default carbon pricing tables for individual third countries starting in 2027.

These options allow importers to tailor their emissions reporting to their operational capabilities. For small foreign suppliers unable to provide detailed environmental data, using default values will be a simpler alternative (avoiding the need for complicated calculations and audits), although generally less financially advantageous, as these values ​​will be established with a ceiling. On the other hand, companies importing from modern, low-emission installations will still be able to demonstrate lower actual emissions – which will reduce their CBAM costs – provided they submit verified reports.

Simple vs. Complex Goods – A New Approach to Emissions in the Value Chain

The amendment introduces a distinction between simple goodswhose emissions result from one basic production process, and complex goods, the production of which involves many stages and components (including precursors, i.e. semi-finished products covered by CBAM or EU ETS used to produce the final product). This is important when calculating the "embedded emissions" attributed to the imported goods, so as to avoid double counting emissions already settled or trace.

Assumptions of the new rules for complex goods:

The new approach rewards transparency and shortens the emission chain to the most important linksIn practice, the importer will focus on obtaining data on emissions related to production key materials components of its goods. For example, if a metal product made of steel and aluminum is imported, the importer will calculate the emissions resulting from the production of steel and aluminum (or use their default or actual values), while emissions from the process of combining these materials into the finished product (unless this process is high-emission and covered by the ETS) will not be included.

This distinction between goods is also important for future expansion of the CBAM scopeThe Commission will assess the possibility of extending the CBAM to additional sectors as early as 2026. The definitions of complex goods and the mechanisms for exempting precursor emissions are intended to prepare the ground for the possible inclusion of more complex products in the CBAM in the future, without excessively complex calculations.

Submitting declarations and managing certificates – new deadlines and settlement rules

The amendment significantly changes schedule and procedures for submitting annual CBAM declarations and handling certificatesThe goal is to give companies more time to fulfill their obligations and to reduce one-time financial burdens by spreading them over time. Below, we explain what the CBAM settlement cycle will look like after 2026.

Extended deadline for the annual CBAM declaration

Annual declaration by October 31: The previous regulations required that an authorized importer until May 31 each year, submitted a declaration for the previous year (including the import volume and calculated emissions) to the CBAM authorities and simultaneously cancelled the corresponding certificates. Omnibus Package extends this deadline by 5 months – until October 31 next year. This means that importers will have almost 10 months (instead of 5) to collect data, verify emissions and prepare an annual declaration.

Example: Next year 2026 the CBAM declaration together with the emission settlement will have to be submitted until October 31, 2027 (instead of by May, as originally scheduled). Similarly, for 2027 – by October 31, 2028, etc. This is a nod to companies that reported difficulties in preparing a complete set of data so quickly after the end of the year.

Synchronization with ETS: The new October deadline better aligns with the EU ETS calendar. National ETS registries often finalize emissions and allocation data by the end of March, while previously CBAM importers had only about two months to comply and purchase certificates. This window is now longer, reducing the risk of haste or errors in declarations.

First settlement year – 2026 settled in 2027

Extended transition period: Although formally The CBAM transition period ends on December 31, 2025., the Omnibus package in practice extends the lack of financial obligations by an additional year. For 2026, importers will not have to purchase certificates quarterly or in 2026. – the sale of certificates will only be launched February 1, 2027. In other words, Emissions imported in 2026 will be settled in one lump sum in 2027.The reason is "many unknowns related to 2026" – the Commission concluded that additional time is needed for the certificate system to function efficiently from a technical and market perspective. For importers, this means that the entire year 2026 will be free from certificate expenses (although data on emissions must be collected and a declaration must be submitted by the end of October 2027 and the amount due must be paid then).

No quarterly payments in 2026: The original regulations stipulated that, starting January 1, 2026, importers would be required to gradually purchase certificates throughout the year – at the end of each quarter, they would have to have at least 80% of them, in an amount corresponding to their emissions since the beginning of the year. removes this obligation for 2026 – the first partial settlements will begin in the first quarter of 2027 (details below). This means that companies will not have to lock up their capital in certificates in 2026 before the end of the year.

Rules for acquiring and redeeming CBAM certificates from 2027

Certificate sales start – February 2027: National authorities will not start selling CBAM units until February 01.02.2027, 2026. From that date, importers will be able to purchase certificates needed to settle emissions for 2027 and gradually for 8. In practice, this gives 2027 additional months (February-September 2026) to collect certificates required for redemption for XNUMX, which significantly alleviates the one-off financial burden.

Obligation to hold 50% of certificates quarterly: Starting from 2027, a relaxed mechanism for protecting against year-end purchase peaks will be introduced. At the end of each quarter the authorized importer will have to have in his account at least 50% the number of certificates corresponding to imported emissions from the beginning of the year to the end of a given quarter. This is reduction of the requirement from the current 80% to 50%The goal: to reduce financial pressure – the importer will purchase only half of the expected certificates during the year, with the remaining amount to be purchased later. For example, after the first quarter of 2027, they must have certificates covering at least 50% of their Q1 emissions, and after the second quarter, 50% of their half-year emissions (if they imported more in Q2, they will purchase additional certificates to cover half of the Q1+Q2 total), etc. The remaining amount will be settled in their annual declaration.

Annual redemption of certificates: After the end of the year, the importer makes the final settlement. In accordance with the new calendar, until September 30/October 31 the following year, an annual declaration must be submitted and redeem the corresponding number of certificatesIn practice, this may occur simultaneously with the submission of the declaration (e.g., by September 30th – according to the Commission's proposal – or by October 31st – according to the final version adopted by the European Parliament). To be on the safe side, it is worth setting a September 30th deadline for the cancellation of certificates for the previous year to meet the cut-off date for unit cancellations (see below).

Cancellation of unused certificates: If an importer purchased more certificates than their final requirements (which can happen, for example, if they prudently purchased certificates during the year), they will be able to recover the excess by selling the certificates to the authority. The new regulations provide favorable changes to the rules: the one-third limit was abolished – until now, the state could only buy back up to 1/3 of the certificates purchased the previous year. Now all surplus certificates can be submitted for redemption, provided they were purchased to meet the quarterly 50% emission requirement. The importer submits a repurchase application to 31 October (if redemption is on September 30) of the year and the unused certificates will then be canceled November 1st without compensation. In other words, after November 1st, any certificates purchased in the previous year will no longer be valid – they must be used (cancelled) or returned for purchase within the stipulated time, otherwise they will be forfeited.

Price of certificates: According to the CBAM mechanism, the price of CBAM units will be linked to the price of EU ETS allowances – is to correspond to the average auction price of EUAs in the week preceding the purchase. Certificates will be available for purchase from national authorities (e.g., via a common central platform operated by the Commission). The fee system and any administrative charges will be specified in implementing acts – the final text stipulates that the Commission may impose a fee for using the certificate sales platform to cover its operating costs. However, there is a caveat that these fees must be limited to covering costs (without generating profit or being unduly burdensome).

Thanks to the above changes, the certificate management process will become more efficient. friendly to the financial liquidity of companies: a smaller portion of certificates purchased "upfront" during the year (50% instead of 80%), full possibility of reselling surpluses, more time to collect funds before final redemption.

Other new rules: country-of-origin carbon fees, indirect representatives, sanctions, registries and transparency

In addition to the key areas discussed above, the Omnibus package introduces a number of additional changes supplementing the CBAM system. They concern, among other things, the method of taking into account emission costs incurred abroad (carbon price paid), clarifying the role of indirect representatives, tightening or easing sanctions for non-compliance, and improving the operation of the register and the flow of information. These issues are as follows:

Schedule for implementing changes and division of responsibilities over the years

The last key issue is implementation calendar new CBAM solutions. Importers need to know which obligations apply to them and from when. Below is a chronological timeline from the transition phase to full implementation, taking into account changes to the Omnibus package:

At this point, importers should focus on transition from the reporting phase to the financial settlement phase in 2026/2027The key is to ensure that the company has the appropriate status (authorization) or qualifies for an exemption by the end of 2025, and to plan a budget for purchasing certificates from 2027. These schedule changes provide some breathing space – the first expenses will come later – but they do not relieve the company of substantive preparations (collecting emissions data, adapting accounting/IT systems to support CBAM, etc.).

Summary

The CBAM Omnibus package brings significant simplifications and clarifications for importers, while maintaining the ambitious environmental goal of the mechanism. The smallest importers will be virtually excluded from the system (leaving them with only simple import volume monitoring), while larger importers will benefit from extended deadlines and more flexible emission reporting methods. Authorization and reporting procedures will be simplified (e.g., the ability to delegate tasks, fewer unnecessary administrative consultations), and financial risks will be minimized thanks to the possibility of spreading certificate purchases into installments and a surplus buyback mechanism.

For importers, the most important thing now is thoroughly familiarize yourself with new responsibilities and deadlines – especially with the 50-ton threshold, the new declaration calendar (October 31st), and the requirements for emissions data. It's worth assessing now whether your company will benefit from the exemption (which does not exempt it from monitoring import volumes) or whether it needs to prepare for the full CBAM regime. Regardless of the import volume, it is recommended to implement internal procedures for recording the carbon intensity of imported products and tracking the total import volume.

The Omnibus package showed that the European legislator is open to adapting regulations to business realities, without sacrificing the fundamental goal of climate policy. Importers should therefore actively use new facilitations (e.g. using default values ​​where data is difficult to obtain) and at the same time ensure that all obligations – from authorization to timely redemption of certificates – will be carried out in accordance with the new guidelinesOrganizational and systemic preparations already in 2025 will allow for a smooth transition to the new CBAM regime from 2026 and avoid a rush in 2027, when the first actual emissions settlement will take place. Thanks to the above changes, the CBAM mechanism becomes more predictable and business-friendly, which should make it easier for importers to meet their obligations while supporting the achievement of the common goal – level playing field in trade and reduction of global CO₂ emissions.

Źródła: The changes described above are taken from official EU documents and expert analyses, including the European Parliament press release and the adopted text of the EP amendments (A10-0085/2025)

One answer

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *